• who@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I would like to see California boldly and forcefully repel this invasion, but I don’t know how it would work.

    The California National Guard is part of the National Guard of the United States, a dual federal-state military reserve force.

    When National Guard troops are called to federal service, the president serves as Commander-In-Chief. The federal mission assigned to the National Guard is: “To provide properly trained and equipped units for prompt mobilization for war, national emergency or as otherwise needed.”

    The governor of California may call individuals or units of the California National Guard into state service during emergencies or special situations. The state mission of the National Guard is: “To provide trained and disciplined forces for domestic emergencies or as otherwise provided by state law.”

    Role: Organized militia
    Size: 24,000

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_National_Guard

    EDIT:

    When I look at this as Trump and his gang deliberately inciting conflict with state/local governments in order to have an excuse to seize control from them before the next election, the situation becomes even trickier.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      4 days ago

      If the governor activates them first, it limits the reasons the president can activate them and override the governor.

      Of course Trump would try to do it anyway, meaning the NG commander would have to decide who to follow (and let’s be real, it would probably be the president).

      • AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        States giving up their military power was a mistake. States need to rebuild and restore their State Guards/State Defense Forces. The ability to federalize the National Guard removes its ability to function as the State Militias that it replaced.

        • Sir Arthur V Quackington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          61
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          No, the mistake was the complete corruption of US politics through naked graft and a FPTP voting system leading to extremist views being the only rallying opposition to reasonable stances.

          The government needs to get purged of lobbyists and money.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          No, being able to federalize them was intended. We weren’t supposed to have a standing federal army, only call them up from the militias as needed.

          Turned out pretty quick that that didn’t work too well in reality.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          State militias were never intended to fight the national government. In fact, they were intended to help fight insurrection.

          Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15. The Congress shall have Power * * * To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.