• Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Oh yeah, there’s always someone “paying” for bad reviews. Yet they can never prove it.

  • audaxdreik@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    The game looks fiiiiiiiiiiine but I’m already exhausted at the thought of another $80 USD price tag with DLC/microtransactions and forced multiplayer elements.

    AAA studios are all doing the same sorts of things and putting just a little twist on it hoping it’ll be enough to persuade you away from all the other AAA games and studious out there doing the exact same thing.

    I’m not a hater, I don’t hate your mediocre looking game that absolutely fails to stand out from the crowd, but I’m not gonna buy into your advertising for it either. To anyone who finds a home in this game and enjoys it, I’m legit happy for you. Mostly I’m just never going to think about this ever again.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Mindseye is $60, and it’s much easier to stand out from the crowd when the crowd is all the way back in 2010.

  • Novamdomum@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    There must be so much paid review manipulation out there but I don’t know if it amounts to much. At the end of the day, if the game is good people will play it. I mean No Man’s Sky came back from the entire world dumping on it from the stratosphere. Also, often overly negative reviews will actually make me more interested in a game, specially if all the negatives don’t sound that bad “Horrible game! I didn’t continuously die and how dare they allow the player to explore anywhere!”.

    • Airowird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Negative reviews usually are more descriptive about the game’s design than positive ones, because it’s a big enough part to stop someone from playing more. Positive reviews are 98% “This game gives me dopamine and/or money”

  • Davel23@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    Based on some comments in the article, it sounds like the guy is accusing Rockstar of financing a smear campaign. Maybe if they made a game that wasn’t a straight GTA clone they wouldn’t have to worry about something like that.

    • StereoCode@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Wild take. Imagine if you made a souls-like game and fromsoft made a smear campaign against you? Assuming this accusation has any legs. It’s highly morally corrupt to just be “don’t make a souls game then”. Most games can be compared to another existing game franchise, it’s called competition.