Thank you

Seems like https://clubsall.com/ is still around

@vinay_clubsall@lemmy.world , any update with the project?

Hello,

You might want to use this kind of links to posts, as they are easier to interact with: https://lemmyverse.link/piefed.social/post/891425

Definitely. Posting https://whtwnd.com/bnewbold.net/3lo7a2a4qxg2l as its own post would probably help

This news probably deserve its own post

Agree, especially as the OOP crossposted it

• https://feddit.org/post/13935434
• https://feddit.org/post/13936043

I like Piefed, it’s my daily driver, but cancelling Lemmy is probably too much.

The majority of people still haven’t moved from !privacy@lemmy.ml (!privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) or !linux@lemmy.ml (!linux@programming.dev ), so trying to get them to switch platform based on “cancelling” isn’t productive.

If you want to advocate for your platform, explain what features Piefed has compared to Lemmy (https://join.piefed.social/features/) instead.

Yeah, I don’t even think this one is your main, but hey, here we are

I’ve been on Piefed for a while. All the people I’ve seen with the warning deserved it.

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/45876492?scrollToComments=true

Only possible to Piefed

Unrelated, but happy cake day

Well, lemm.ee shutdown lead some communities to move to Piefed

Nice to see more Piefed instances popping

Thank you for the precision!

Piefed shows comments from all the crossposts

Example: https://piefed.social/post/871116?sort=new#post_replies

Piefed has that warning when you are in the posting menu

Just link them on the bios and keep the same username. That usually does the job

!fedibridge@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Great minds think alike!

I forgot that you are selective with your tolerance with hyperbole.

Hyperbole in this context is borderline disinformation.

“Trump Musk filter”

This filter offers a choice when the users signs up. The new joiner can enable it completely, moderately, or not at all. So in this case, it is indeed the users’ choice.

This is what it looks like in the user settings

“Vote weighting”

Do we expect every single user to assess all of the toxic communities, or do we prefer to rely on admins to make decision for the userbase?

In the same way that defederation is an admin-level decision impacting all of the userbase, having those defined at an admin level seem reasonable.

“Attitude and Reputation scoring”.

This is visible for users as well, I guess I misunderstood what you meant? https://piefed.social/u/rglullis@communick.news

every single one of those features

First features presented: site name, tagline, sidebar, announcement and icons.

Why would those be managed at the user level?