Skiluros

When did I or the poster I am refering to say the murder was justified?

Don’t know why you’re getting downvoted.

People, read the article.

Thanks man!

Let’s how tonight goes.

I was honestly surprised that they went with such a statement. Putin is smart enough (smarter than much of the US) to understand that Trump is a lazy degenerate, but it seems a bit premature to openly ridicule Trump.

Ukrainian, living in Kyiv (have lived in other cities too).

It does seem that Kyiv has by far the best AA defence systems in the country. For what it’s worth, I’d rather they target Kyiv if that helps blunt the impact of the attacks.

That being said, it’s not fun to have constant shockwaves and loud noises from explosions/takedowns all night. Not to mention the risk of death/getting wounded and/or having your apartment be heavily damaged.

Best option would be if all regions could have an AA defence comparable to Kyiv, but unfortunately that’s not possible.

For a second there, I missed the sarcasm.

Is there some truth to what Tesla responded with? Very likely.

Where is the proof? Why didn’t Tesla sue Reuters if they are lying?

Factually speaking, it was considered not true, but he also didn’t fight it as they were threatening the existence of the company at a very difficult time so he settled with the SEC.

Conspiracy theory bullshit. Where is the proof?

I bring it up because it’s the same new manufacturing process as the 25k car. It’s a wholly new way to manufacture cars

Where is the proof other than corporate PR? Send me a BOM analysis based on current estimates (with details) and other relevant financial details. This is not a big ask, there are solid BOM analyses for many “leading edge” hardware products (I’ve done professional work on this, so I would know).

The point I am making is that I am not buying your “judicial roleplay” (pretending that this is a court of law with all the theatrics about the nature of proving something). Not to mention it’s pretty sophomoric of you to assume that unless a (US!) court rules on something, then we have to immediately defer to corporate PR copytext and we cannot make any analysis beyond that.

I’ve lived in the US. I know how badly Americans reflexively react to someone not buying into their local assumptions. So in a sense I understand you.

But that doesn’t mean I am going to buy into your bullshit.

One other option beyond BDS (and not involving an invasion) would be countries removing diplomatic recognition of Israel and expelling all Israeli diplomats.

This is of course easier said than done, but it’s far more viable than any other alternative courses of action.

The “muh MSM clickbait” is just American-style intellectual laziness on your part. Where is your proof for this?

Why doesn’t Musk sue them if they are lying?

So do you have insider information or not? If not, why bring up the cybercab or whatever? Are you saying you are the only one who knows about it and you’re claiming that Reuters ignored this info and just want to get clicks. Where is your proof for this?

Did Musk not lie about “deal accomplished”. Wasn’t this even proven in some US institution (SEC if I remember correctly?)?

Why would it raise concern in the Canadian Jewish and Israeli communities?

Not that Microsoft is any better (they are a criminal oligarch organization), but they are not stupid!

It seems that the Israelis were killing civilians, not US mercenaries.

I think this is all bullshit for market manipulation. “Lars” can say he has three dicks, that doesn’t make it so.

Musk is a known and confirmed liar (“deal secured”), it is reasonable to assume he has a level of commitment to dishonesty, especially considering he lives in the US, where criminality and dishonesty are broadly encouraged both at an institutional level and among wider society.

You bring all this cybercab and unboxed stuff, what makes you think you are more qualified to evaluate these points than Reuters?

Are you claiming you have insider info or are you just repeating various Tesla PR copytext?

It’s really too bad that Lemmy MAUs are once again on a decline curve. I was really hoping we would stabilize above 50K MAU.

As I am not a lawyer and I don’t support “wiggle” room judicial approaches when it comes to oligarchs (especially ones that have been caught lying in similar cases before - e.g. “funding acquired [with Saudi sovereign fund”).

What may happen in a few years is IMO irrelevant. We are discussing things as they stand now. It’s either cancelled or not with respect to short/medium term introduction.

As the old saying goes, in the long term, we are all dead.

I am no lawyer, but I think it possible to relatively easily prove whether the project is current or not. I mean “prove” in the real sense, i.e. any individual of sound mind would agree that it was actually cancelled and the attempts to bring in delays and so on are are malicious actions to avoid legal responsibility.

This is not a complex issue, either the project was cancelled or it wasn’t.

How is this even legal?

And this is not the first time Elmo has been engaged in market manipulation via premeditated misinformation campaigns.

Says who?

It’s pretty clear you have no clue what you are talking about or you’re playing dumb (in an effort to work as a free PR shill for China).

I am done here!

What info have you provided?

There is no moving goalposts. From the Wikipedia article:

Construction of the port commenced in January 2008. In 2016, it reported an operating profit of $1.81 million but was considered economically unviable.[4] As debt repayment got difficult, the newly-elected government decided to privatise an 80% stake of the port to raise foreign exchange in order to repay maturing sovereign bonds unrelated to the port.[5][6] Of the two bidding companies, China Merchants Port was chosen,[5] which was to pay $1.12 billion to Sri Lanka and spend additional amounts to develop the port into full operation.[7][8][9]

In July 2017, the agreement was signed, but CMPort was allowed a 70% stake. Simultaneously a 99-year lease on the port was granted to CMPort.

Can you explain Kerry Brown’s arguement in context of this information?

Russophia is a propaganda term.

A sober view of russian “culture” and history is not a phobia. It is reasonable to approach russians as they are (e.g. strong majority support for genocidal imperialism even with adjustments for preference falsification during polling) and not as one would like them to be.