

OP, come the fuck on. Have some integrity and don’t post articles from The Economic Times.
“Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: […] like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.” —Jonathan Swift
OP, come the fuck on. Have some integrity and don’t post articles from The Economic Times.
No, they definitely are AI. ChatGPT for example is a generative pretrained transformer (GPT) is a transformer model is a deep learning model is a machine learning model is AI.
It’s just that the general public has no fucking idea what “AI” is due to being swamped in marketing about a field they have zero background in and have been led to believe is some kind of general intellect on the level of a human or smarter. In reality, a perceptron with one weight and one bias is machine learning is AI.
Since the start, what “AI” is has been fairly arbitrary; it’s just the ability for a machine to perform tasks we’d associate with human intelligence. It doesn’t even need to be machine learning; that’s just one branch. The game Video Checkers (1980) for the Atari 2600 running on 128 bytes of RAM has AI that you play against. The bar isn’t high at all.
it shouldn't be that hard?
OP, what’s your background to make you think that way, and if you’re qualified enough to make that assessment, why aren’t you getting to work building the ground floor of something potentially highly lucrative?
The response to “It shouldn’t be that hard” for FOSS is invariably “PRs welcome”.
The difference: Israel is in Syria for imperialist aggression. Ukraine is in Ukraine to protect their homeland from imperialist aggresssion. Combine that with Israel’s pathological need to cover up and deny their extensive, seemingly neverending war crimes in Gaza… Yeah, I don’t have any faith until Israel can prove this was opsec rather than covering up. Israel has destroyed their chance for benefit of the doubt.
Even if it is opsec, they have no right being there, so fuck 'em. I hope their opsec isn’t maintained and their soldiers do die in much the same way I’d hope for a Russian base in Donetsk.
“It was terrible. He would spend hours telling me about how NFTs are the future and I need to get in on the ground floor.”
I know what community this is, Blaze, but it baffles me to recommend this over Element.
Edit: So to be clear, they say it’s a fork of Element, but that doesn’t tell me the license or give me the source code. Trying to find the source code for the messaging app just returns this crap about their an AI service which is just ChatGPT wrapper number 486 billion.
Edit 2: Okay, I think the confusion over this AI BS is that there’s lux.chat – ChatGPT wrapper garbage – and luxchat – an Element fork. I have no idea if these are related. If they are, this information is too hard to find. If they aren’t… I mean maybe if you had more information on your website, luxchat, I wouldn’t have to scour the Internet to find that information and run into lux.chat.
Edit 3: The FAQ clears literally none of my questions up. Cool.
A starter home?! This home is a finisher home! A shelterer of gods! The GOLDEN GOD!
I am untethered, and my rage knows no bounds!
Is someone upset they can’t fork over more money to the rabidly transphobic piece of shit and the media conglomerate megacorp?
Fucking thank you. Yes, experienced editor to add to this: that’s called the lead, and that’s exactly what it exists to do. Readers are not even close to starved for summaries:
What’s outrageous here isn’t wanting summaries; it’s that summaries already exist in so many ways, written by the human writers who write the contents of the articles. Not only that, but as a free, editable encyclopedia, these summaries can be changed at any time if editors feel like they no longer do their job somehow.
This not only bypasses the hard work real, human editors put in for free in favor of some generic slop that’s impossible to QA, but it also bypasses the spirit of Wikipedia that if you see something wrong, you should be able to fix it.