• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 18th, 2023

help-circle
  • This should definitely be the approach for the first phase of protesting, but I fear this is also missing the part where fascists — including the oligarch owned media — will actively produce and disseminate disinformation to justify their crimes, regardless of how peaceful and disciplined protesters are. I fear fascists will continue escalating to mass murder either way.

    Remember “They’re eating cats and dogs” or “kitty litter in schools” or “migrant caravan”?

    In the age of disinformation, facing a fascist mass murder, protesters need to be prepared for “peaceful” to turn into Tiananmen square, at which point there’s no reason to congregate around the square anymore; you need to switch gears and go guerrilla warfare. Obviously this should never be done anywhere near a protest. It should never be waged against civilians/MAGA voters, cops, troops, or federal agents. It should only ever be targeted specifically at the fascist leadership, and their immediate senior accomplices. Wasting time or effort on low value targets is counterproductive.




  • This article has some good points, and the EU definitely needs to standardise and integrate, but quotes like this completely miss the economies of scale the USA MIC is operating under.

    Look for instance at the price of modern, third-generation battle tanks and the cost of self-propelled howitzers, which have been key to the fighting in Ukraine. German prices are far higher than their American counterparts.

    The US has produced well over 10k of this “main battle tank” in the last 40 years, and has at least 10x the number of those in active duty as Germany. All of the EU’s combined tanks (of comparable capability) would probably still be less than half, or even a quarter, the size of the USA’s. Naturally, the average cost is much less when you build 10k instead of a few hundred.



  • Apple will never do this as it would kill the MacBook Air market. Same reason why they’ll never add a touch screen to a MacBook. iPadOS is their heavily locked-down anticompetitive monopoly desktop OS, a la iOS. Every iteration of macOS in the last decade has destroyed api’s and features which non-apple apps and services rely on. Apple are more likely to get rid of MacBooks and macOS in favour of iPadOS, once it does enough for non-superuser “pros” to use it full time.

    This is why their monopoly should be broken, they should be forced to open up their firmware/hardware for alternative OS’s, and open up their OS api’s so alternatives can implement real/legitimate feature parity with iCloud etc, and all of Apple’s own services.




  • If their code isn’t open source, and your searches aren’t encrypted in such a way that their logging of them isn’t an option, why should you believe them? It’s not like there’s some precedence that corporations face any legitimate consequences for their crimes. Unless they steal from the wealthy, any consequences will be less than the profits from their crimes.










  • *Because surveillance capitalism has consumed our governments and is writing regulations that expand their data collection capabilities… under the guise of “protecting kids”, “fighting crime”, or “terrorism”.

    Their approach has not changed in decades, yet the majority continually fall for it, over and over again.

    Epstein didn’t hill himself, and his closest friends were oligarchs, including European royalty and the US president.



  • Surveillance capitalism benefits the most criminal and corrupt the most. As they possess no morals or ethics, they’re happy to use all available data and methods — however illegal — to engage in psychological warfare, disinformation, and straight lies to “con” voters into supporting criminals.

    This means that surveillance capitalism is authoritarianism, as it will serve to promote the worst governance and destroy the best; the enshittification of government. It is the greatest threat to transparent, honest, and just governance — to democracy — probably in all of modern history; certainly in the history of politics and information warfare.