

The video from the article: https://youtu.be/aukyzgAGHM4
The video from the article: https://youtu.be/aukyzgAGHM4
Their HA infrastructure is all built on open source projects. The thing they have that we don’t is teams of SREs on-call 24/7.
So they claim.
Looking through the commit history there are numerous “Manually fixed…” commits, where the LLM doesn’t do what the programmer wants after repeated prompting, so they fix it themself.
And here is the problem. It required expert supervision for the prompts to be repeatedly refined, and the code manually fixed, until the code was correct. This doesn’t save any labour, it just changes the nature of programming into code review.
If this programmer wasn’t already an expert in this problem domain then I have no doubt that this component would be full of bugs and security issues.
Meaning it’s really just running in their closet,
You think they’re lying about having their hardware in a colo?
What’s it supposed to do?
Probably because the person who made the image didn’t really think too hard about their job.
Not everyone from .ml is a tankie. I was trying to make a joke.
I think you’ve misunderstood what AGI means.
If AGI is made of components, you could argue that it isn’t “general”.
Can you elaborate? I don’t get what you mean by this.
“Let them eat cloud.”
Alt text: