You’re doing it wrong. I want to run a macOS container on Linux

Stop. Buying. Eggs.

Please log in to prove you’re not a bot

Just whisper gentoo in his ear

Yeah, they’re just expecting that you boil it. Because even bottled water, you’re gonna have to boil before using it as a nasal rinse

Do they say you don’t have to boil it?

Or do they just not explicitly mention tbr obvious?

Yes. Using tap water is safe.

And you’re supposed to boil the tap water

Why? Countries become rich by greed.

I bet every “richest country in the world” in the history of earth had horrible poverty. How else would they become the richest country in the world? It’s kinda an expected prerequisite

You want steitle, not filtered, water

That’s not safe. You should boil the water.

It’s saline. So salt and baking soda

This is safe, if you boil the water.

It means that any company can take that code, modify it (as would be required every year per IRS tax changes), and resell it without being required to publish the source code changes.

What many European countries are doing is requiring the government to publish code under a copyleft license. That would allow companies to also benefit from this code to make their own tools (which they could also sell), and it would require them to publish the source code of their improvements.

Basically copyleft legally ensures collaboration. Public domain does not.

That was before copyleft was a thing. Many European governments are now requiring tax funded software to be copyleft.

There are exceptions to that law, such as the USPS. Sounds like we need to contact our legislators to get the law updated

Licensing CC0 is just subsidizing corporations at the expense of tax payers. It should be copyleft because it was funded publicly

It means that any company can take that code, modify it (as would be required every year per IRS tax changes), and resell it without being required to publish the source code changes.

What many European countries are doing is requiring the government to publish code under a copyleft license. That would allow companies to also benefit from this code to make their own tools (which they could also sell), and it would require them to publish the source code of their improvements.

Basically copyleft legally ensures collaboration. Public domain does not.

Nah, that law was written before copyleft licenses were widespread. There are exemptions for contractors and some groups like USPS.

I’m saying that law is wrong, and it needs to be changed.

It means that any company can take that code, modify it (as would be required every year per IRS tax changes), and resell it without being required to publish the source code changes.

What many European countries are doing is requiring the government to publish code under a copyleft license. That would allow companies to also benefit from this code to make their own tools (which they could also sell), and it would require them to publish the source code of their improvements.

Basically copyleft legally ensures collaboration. Public domain does not.

CC0 = gift to corporations at the expense of taxpayers

Copyleft = everyone owns it and all derivatives, even from corporations

It means that any company can take that code, modify it (as would be required every year per IRS tax changes), and resell it without being required to publish the source code changes.

What many European countries are doing is requiring the government to publish code under a copyleft license. That would allow companies to also benefit from this code to make their own tools (which they could also sell), and it would require them to publish the source code of their improvements.

Basically copyleft legally ensures collaboration. Public domain does not.

A copyleft would absolutely be appropriate here.

It was paid for with public funds.