I’m not sure you understand that anyone can afford to pay a small enough sum for food
the point isn’t that the money will cover the cost
if lunch costs less than a dollar every single kid will be able to pay that and if they don’t their teacher could easily provide because of how small a sum of money that is
everyone has at least a dollar
and if they don’t then have the lunch be further subsidized
but the cost should be just above $0
I think school lunch should cost something, but very little, just so the kids can understand the value of money
like a dollar per lunch isnt that much at all
but it shouldn’t place a large financial strain on poor families
edit: I honestly feel like a lot of you are simply looking at the upvote/downvotes ratio and basing your reaction off that rather than the content. If the lunch is cheap enough, everyone will be able to cover it, but I’m advocating for making it cost slightly more than zero
downvotes are from tankies
All code paid for by taxpayer dollars should be open source, available for comment, for feedback, for people to build on and for people in other agencies to replicate.
as long as its not military stuff, I don’t want to be able to download a simulator for nuclear bombs or something on my PC
War should be costly and terrible
and it still is and it will be
that’s the point, more often that not, to take money and burn it while producing more fuel for propaganda
not saying that’s whats happening in Ukraine, but this has happened a ton in the past and will continue
govts should stop making unenforceable laws
like the French govgt shouldn’t even be considering making something like this if the website can just pull out of the country and still get all the traffic with vpns and tor
big brother isn’t the future
its a wonderful, wholesome, big family we can expect, everyone watching everyone else
which isn’t much better ngl
yeah people don’t understand DOGE might be the best investment known to mankind
because some people on this thread cant take a joke, \s
yeah honestly though a man with 200 billion is vastly more wealthy than someone with 100 million
holding BTC long term isn’t that risky
and the ‘full faith and credit of a nation’ uhhhh the nation in question is the US. not a bad idea to consider other things to put money into
there’s better methods than how Bitcoin works (PoW) like Proof of Stake, but that has its own problems, like bringing more centralization to the network. Like how with bitcoin if a miner controls more than half of the global hash rates, they can mint more money than should be, in a currency with PoS they could just buy half of the coins and do it. They probably wouldn’t because its not in their self interest, but its still a problem
imagine not being able to read
they literally said some is a scam
therefore they don’t consider all of it to be good, and therefore they don’t ‘simp’ for it
well they do have a ton of valid use cases for stuff like drug development and training self driving cars and so forth
its not all ai ‘art’
and the internet sorta relies on them too for storing websites
most of the shareholders aren’t ‘plebs’
then put the data centers where there is more water🤦
this doesn’t seem that complex at all
As long as those companies have to compete with each other for mining, there is some decentralization. Ofc it could be a ton more, some currencies like Monero use different hash functions that cant have custom chips made for them, making it easier for traditional CPUs to mine it, so large companies cant control vast amounts of the hash rate.
the future is gonna be fucking insane
yeah 90%+ of the cost would be covered and the rest would be small enough that it wouldnt place a financial burden on anyone