• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Now that she’s spoken out against genocide, I can no longer tell if the people who hate her are democrats or republicans.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It is funny that she was a media darling up until the moment she started talking about Gaza. Same thing happened to Malala. You won’t see either of those on cable or in talk shows any more.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Uh… What the fuck man? This woman was going to an active warzone to deliver aid to genocide victims. Let me repeat, she was headed to an active warzone where aid workers have routinely been targeted and murdered. If you think that’s making a career out of a viral moment then you need to fuck off.

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I have complex feelings regarding Greta.

        Sure, she’s an inspiration and she’s courageous and selfless and her heart is in the right place.

        Other people were on this boat who were also at risk, many other atrocities have occurred during this war and the one in Ukraine in which Greta wasn’t present. Her involvement in this one is not why it’s significant, and the people present at all the others were no less courageous than Greta.

        In fact, there’s a lot of other people being a lot more courageous receiving a lot less recognition.

        Additionally, in some cases the recognition Greta receives is counter-productive. I mean, putting a world famous influencer on a humanitarian mission to a place where the aggressors want as little attention as possible isn’t really a sound strategy.

        All that aside, I have two main concerns:

        One is that Greta is the hero of the leftists, but she’s unable to engage with the right - the people who really need to alter their behavior. To them she’s just an insufferable child who makes them feel guilty - that’s not how you reach people and propagate change.

        Second is that, I don’t think she’s used her influence very well. During the US campaign she was pushing the “both sides bad” narrative.

        Edit: I’m happy to wear the drive-by downvotes, but I had hoped for some more compelling rebuttals - 150 downvotes deep and the best we’ve received is that Kamala was bad.

        • realitista@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          She’s unable to engage with the right because she’s a…

          Decent Human Being

          …We’ll see if Elon can do it, he’s a piece of shit, they should find him very relatable.

          • bean@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Right? Like what is his argument? “I don’t like Greta because she doesn’t cater to everybody.”

            • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              No, I said it up top. She’s unable to reach the people who need to change, and she’s actively undermined those who can.

              It’s great that you love her, but you don’t need to hear her message, do you.