When the one percent starts to feel paranoid, Clay Cockrell is the first to hear about it. A therapist who specializes in treating the neuroses of the ultrawealthy, Cockrell says that many of his clients are in the privileged position of getting freaked out by eat-the-rich sentiments these days.

  • Grizzlyboy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not like there’s a history of killing them to make a new status quo! Maybe they shouldn’t be greedy pieces of shit and fucking over everyone else? Leeches.

    • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wow, shitting on their entire way of life. If tbey werent “greedy pieces of shit” they wouldn’t even be rich!

      Maybe you should have some fucking empathy. And also let them harvest your organs so they can have extras.

  • Fingolfinz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s all from a place of selfishness for them I’m sure so there won’t be any meaningful change as a result of their fear. They deserve to feel this way but I wish it would lead to a positive outcome but they are shameless wretches so they’ll respond as we expect shameless wretches to

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Good news though, Trump is absolutely destroying the dollar so soon we’ll all need wheelbarrows to carry around our worthless piles of US dollars.

  • Inucune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well if all that money and resources are making you uncomfortable, I am willing to take them off your hands…

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    they’re genuinely trying to downplay what they have. It’s not just quiet — it’s silent. In an era of rising economic tension and class rage, a rich person’s privacy has become the ultimate commodity. They don’t want to be seen at the Chanel store.

    For a long time here in the US, inequality has been treated as no big deal. “Oh, inequality is growing?,” said the business leaders and economists, “Why should we care?”

    This is why.

    • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      3 days ago

      When it boils over, the lesson it will teach society will be bloody and painful.

      I doubt the lesson will be learned well.

      • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        It is never learned, not because people are dumb and can’t remember, but new people take the places of both sides.

        • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          The problem I have, is that some people DO learn the lessons, even from the books and stories left over from before. It’s just that the new people don’t care to learn anything.

          It’s so disheartening.

          • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Class politics is a learned generational institution. If I look at history I can see that technological disruption, and loss of social cohesion can dampen this.

            Today in some countries, like the USA, we have a minimum of both teachers and examples that show such things are worthwhile. We have lost institutional knowledge about how to form unions, strike or protest.

            This goes beyond the workplace.

            Knowledge of how local municipal politics work and what is democracy is lacking. If one looks at how people vote, one sees a complete lack of awareness of vote counting or exit polls in the USA, replaced by a childish faith in some imaginary fair system that blindly picks the winners. Many great grandparents would scorn this. But there is nobody to tell the current people differently

  • whalebiologist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    So funny to be in therapy telling your friend-for-hire that you are anxious and uncertain about what to do, because the idea of living modestly and giving to the needy is not even worthy of consideration to them.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’d be happy if they just didn’t try to bleed the world dry for like a minute at least.

    • Tedesche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t call therapists “friends-for-hire.” It’s a lame insult to a serious and needed profession.

      • misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s a dig at the rich, not the professionals. There are a lot of kitschy “therapists” that serve the rich, they have no qualifications and may play the friend role. And then there are actual professionals, like LMFT and they’ll establish a clear boundary.

      • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not sure if I should bring up the homeless vets with PTSD who’d love someone to talk to, for hire or not, qualified or not; or if I should make light of asking my own friend for hire about coping with the depression and anxiety of living in a world that the ultrawealthy have immiserated for their wealth.

        The rich are worried about people hating them for being rich while everyone else is burning out from the stress of coping with living in situations that are literally depressing.

        Maybe people don’t need to feel better about it? Maybe the rich should be afraid and feel like shit? Maybe the poor should be angry and upset? Maybe people on the internet use humor to cope with difficult situations and being a wokescold finger-wagger about it is counterproductive?

        • Tedesche@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Maybe my comment was limited to what it commented on and you shouldn’t be assuming a whole bunch of other things I didn’t say?

  • ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    3 days ago

    i have a foolproof strategy to protect them. they should just broaden the target base by immersing themselves among other rich people.

    and the most effective method would be making everybody else equally rich. bam. you’re now only one potential target among eight billion.

    my ted talk will be aired soon.